* Grammar – poem with “syntax”: Check!
I wrote about “Going to Him! Happy letter!” in the very late-June post mentioned above, HERE.
* Eben Loomis' poem "A Sunset Idyl": Check!
I commented on Mabel Loomis Todd’s father’s poem over the course of two days, HERE and HERE.
* Mathematics v. grammar – info on short poem re: ingots/Peru: Check!
At first, I couldn’t remember what this reminder was all about, but I finally figured it out, HERE.
* Dashes – info from Helen V’s book: Check!
That’s the focus for my post today – so cast your eyes and thoughts below, dear reader!
However, before I get to “Helen V’s book,” which is Helen Vendler’s Dickinson, Selected Poems and Commentaries, let me share a crafty little post I came across the other day on Tumblr from the mind of “gnars-house”:
| Of course, my first thought was, “Dash it all – why didn’t I write that?” So simple. So true. So apparent. My second thought was of Helen Vendler, for Gnars-house’s chef-d'oeuvre reminded me of my record of unfinished business and my pledge to address “Dashes – info from Helen V’s book” – so let's dive in, shall we? |
I paged through my copy of Franklin’s The Poems of Emily Dickinson. Poem number 9, “If recollecting were forgetting” – no dashes. Hmm…but take a look to the right of her name at the bottom of the original manuscript. Do I detect a dash?
Well, it is – but it wasn't when I first checked. Here's the story:
Below: Index entries in the Miller edition of Dickinson's poems.
The "M40" stands for "Miller edition, page 40," and sure enough, there on page 40 of Miller's edition was the poem – although beginning with the word "Oh" (in italics), and not "If."
| At the right: The poem as it appears in Miller's edition. And did you notice? There are five dashes in the poem! So why no dashes in the Franklin edition? You see, in Cristanne Miller's edition, she included the poems "as she preserved them" -- so Miller published the poem as it appeared in Dickinson's Fascicle One, from the summer of 1858. In Franklin's edition, his policy was "to choose the latest version of the entire poem, thereby giving to the poet, rather than the editor, the ownership of change." Since the poem with no dashes was sent to Bowles in 1859, that later version was published. |
| The lower portion of the manuscript (as seen above) was destroyed or lost; however, a transcript of the poem made by Mabel Todd when the manuscript was intact supplies the last six lines of the poem. But think about that for a moment. Todd, the editor of the first posthumously published collections of Dickinson poetry – who modified much of the poet’s punctuation and grammar – transcribed the poem – so who knows. Maybe there were dashes used throughout the poem? Vendler offers a similar – and intriguing – discussion on this matter (a dash-less poem that likely was penned with dashes) – so I’ll get to that tomorrow. |
RSS Feed