Category: Franklin Edition

I Am Whole Once More

11/21/2020

I have absolutely no idea what has happened to my Franklin edition of The Poems of Emily Dickinson. Did I leave it somewhere -- in some restaurant or coffee shop? Did I misplace it on a trip when I brought the book along for some late night reading? Did some literate thief burgle my home and take just that book?

Posters around town didn't work, nor did my "Got Dickinson?" campaign on milk cartons. Alas, I had to re-order the book, and Charm City Books came to my rescue. My new edition arrived today (below right).

The cover's changed with this new edition, but the contents are the same. I am whole once more.

Is there a book missing from your life? Contact the life-savers at Charm City Books -- they can help! Click HERE.

0 Comments

Unsolved Mysteries

7/17/2019

0 Comments

From our master grammarian & resident logophile, Angstrom Dickinson:

Back in March of this year, I wrote about a mysterious letter “E” that appears before “It sifts from Leaden Sieves” in my 1998 Franklin edition of The Poems of Emily Dickinson – you can read about that HERE.

Now, I’m looking into a second mystery: I just realized that “I would distil a cup” appears in my 1960 Johnson edition of The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (J-16), but I can’t find it anywhere in my Franklin edition. What gives?

Here’s the the poem:

By Emily Dickinson:

I would distil a cup,
And bear to all my friends,
Drinking to her no more astir,
By beck, or burn, or moor!

Below: "I would distil a cup" -- J-16 -- appears at the page break for pages 13 and 14 in the Johnson edition of The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson.

I checked the Emily Dickinson Archive to see if that might shed some light on the mystery, but it indicated that “I would distil a cup” – which Emily had included in a letter to Samual Bowler and Mary Bowles – appeared only in the Johnson edition. I searched the words “distil,” “beck,” and “astir,” and all three queries yielded the same information. I thought, perhaps, that the lines (or similar lines) from “I would distil a cup” would appear embedded in some other poem by Dickinson in the Franklin edition. Alas, no. “I would distil a cup” seems to have vanished with Franklin’s edition of the Belle of Amherst’s poetry.

Below: The results when I searched the word "beck" in the Emily Dickinson Archive turned up one entry for "I would distil a cup":

Do any Dickinson scholars out there have any info on this mystery – as to why “I would distil a cup” does not appear in the Franklin edition of The Poems of Emily Dickinson?

FYI: Information related to the origin of “I would distil a cup” can be found HERE.

0 Comments

Letter of Introduction

3/17/2019

0 Comments

Recently I have published some plog (poetry blog) posts about variations in poems by Emily Dickinson in the Johnson and Franklin editions of her poetry. This all started with a post about a quote from Oscar Wilde -- HERE -- and then I moved on to discuss Johnson v. Franklin -- HERE (from 3/10/19) and HERE (from 3/13/19).

In the post dated March 10, 2019, I discussed Dickinson's poem "It sifts from Leaden Sieves," which is number 311 in Johnson's edition and number 291 in Franklin's. Following the opening stanza, the poem differs significantly in the two volumes. In Johnson's book, the poem is 5 stanzas long. In Franklin's it is 3 -- and Franklin noted in the introduction to his collection that he always chose "the latest version of the entire poem, thereby giving to the poet, rather than the editor, the ownership of change.”

However, besides the two very different versions of the poem, there is one other mystery (or should I say, "myster-E"?): In Franklin's volume "The Poems of Emily Dickinson," there is a capital "E" just before the opening line of the poem.

No where else in the over-six-hundred page book with 1,789 poems does a letter appear before the start of a poem.

Does anyone know what this E stands for? Is it just a printing error -- or is that E supposed to be there?

If you can help solve this myster-E, please let me know. Comment below, or reach out on our "Contact Us" page, HERE.

0 Comments

A World of Difference

3/13/2019

0 Comments

From our master grammarian & resident logophile, Angstrom Dickinson:

In a recent plog (poetry blog) post, I wrote about differences between The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, edited by Thomas H. Johnson, and The Poems of Emily Dickinson, edited by R. W. Franklin. The post is HERE, and in it I discuss the order of the poems, identical poems (or those with very insignificant differences), poems with interesting differences, and poems with significant differences – and that was just the start. There are other differences:

COMBINED/SEPARATED POEMS

Sometimes individual poems in one book are combined (or separated) to create a single poem (or multiple poems) in the other volume. For example, F-335, “Her smile was shaped like other smiles,” in the Franklin edition, is made up of two poems from the Johnson edition, J-514, “Her smile was shaped like other smiles,” and J-353, “A happy lip – breaks sudden.”

On the other hand, three poems in Franklin's book – F-29, “All these my banners be,” F-30, “To lose – if One can find again,” and F-31, “To him who keeps an Orchis’ heart" – are combined in one poem in the Johnson edition, J-22, “All these my banners be.”

RECENTLY DISCOVERED POEMS

Some poems in the Franklin edition were unknown at the time of the Johnson edition. Therefore, the “complete” poems edited by Johnson were the those poems known at the time, but the volume is no longer “complete.” I suspect Franklin realized that addition poems could be discovered in the future – and that is why he did not include the word “complete” in the title of his volume, “The Poems of Emily Dickinson.”

One example of a poem that is in Franklin but is not found in Johnson is F-1244, “Fly – fly—but as you fly”:

Fly – fly – but as you fly –
Remember – the second pass you by –
The Second is pursuing the Century
The Century is chasing Eternity –
What a Responsibility –
No wonder that the little Second flee –
Out of it’s frightened way –

Note: Franklin left the apostrophe in “it’s” as Dickinson wrote it.

0 Comments

Vive La Différence

3/10/2019

0 Comments

From our master grammarian & resident logophile, Angstrom Dickinson:

Recently I came across an Oscar Wilde quote on Twitter about a poet’s ability to survive everything “but a misprint.” On the same day I came across a misprint within an online version of a poem by Emily Dickinson. I wrote about it HERE.

In that post I also mentioned some of the differences between the Johnson and the Franklin editions of Dickinson’s poetry.

My (now-ragged) copy of “The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson” edited by Thomas H. Johnson was published in 1960, and the introduction to the book states, “The text for this edition…reproduces solely and completely that of the 1955 variorum edition, but intended as a reading text, it selects but one form of each poem.” It further notes, “The order of the poems is that the Harvard (variorum) edition.”

My (close-to-ragged) copy of “The Poems of Emily Dickinson” edited by R. W. Franklin was published in 1998, and the introduction to this volume states, “About three fourths of the poems exist in a single source. For the rest, with from two to seven sources, the policy has been to choose the latest version of the entire poem, thereby giving to the poet, rather than the editor, the ownership of change.”

Franklin also noted, “With Dickinson’s practice in her manuscripts as the standard for representing her poem, this volume follows her spelling, capitalization punctuation and usage.” Johnson, in his 1955 volume, stated “I have silently corrected obvious misspelling…and misplaced apostrophes. Punctuation and capitalization remain unaltered….Capitalization, though often capricious, is likewise untouched.”

Below left: My Johnson edition of Dickinson's poetry is falling apart -- and the cover is taped together with scotch tape. Below right: My Franklin edition is in better shape -- but it won't be too much longer until I need a new one. : )

So how similar – or different – are the two volumes?

ORDER

In some instances, poems are very close to the same order in both books. For example, poems J-119 (Talk with prudence to a Beggar), J-120 (If this is “fading”), and J-121 (A Watchers hang opon the East) in the Johnson edition, are numbers F-118, F-119, and F-120 in the Franklin edition.

In other cases, though, poems are significantly distant in their order. For example, F-56 (I’ve got an arrow here) is toward the end of the Johnson edition, numbered J-1729.

IDENTICAL POEMS (or those with very minor differences)

In some cases, poems in both the Johnson and the Franklin editions are exactly the same. For example, poems J-381 and F-643 (A Secret told) are identical in every way. In other cases, differences can be as minor as a single capital letter. For example, with J-435 and F-620 (Much Madness is divinest Sense), the only difference appears in the fifth line of the poem, “In this, as all, prevail.” The Johnson version includes a capital “A” with the word “All,” while the Franklin edition has a lower case “a.”

POEMS WITH INTERESTING DIFFERENCES

Some poems in the two editions have more intriguing differences – more than just a capital letter, an altered spelling, or a shifted punctuation mark. I think one of the more intriguing – but subtle differences – occurs in J-341/F-372 (After great pain, a formal feeling comes). The second stanza of the poem in the Johnson edition reads as follows:

The Feet, mechanical, go round –
Of Ground, or Air, or Ought –
A Wooden way
Regardless grown,
A Quartz contentment, like a stone –

Note the slight – or significant? – change in the second and third lines of the second stanza in the Franklin edition:

The Feet, mechanical, go round –
A Wooden way
Of Ground, or Air, or Ought –
Regardless grown,
A Quartz contentment, like a stone –

Does the change make any difference?

A similar change in a piece of music would be undeniably significant. Take Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony – what if the third and fourth measures were flipped with the first and second?

POEMS WITH SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES

When comparing Dickinson’s poems in the Johnson and Franklin editions, occasionally poems with the same first line are significantly different. Take F-291 and J-311, “It sifts from Leaden Sieves”:

J-311

It sifts from Leaden Sieves –
It powders all the Wood.
It fills with Alabaster Wool
The Wrinkles of the Road –

It makes an Even Face
Of Mountain, and of Plain –
Unbroken Forehead from the East
Unto the East again –

It reaches to the Fence –
It wraps it Rail by Rail
Till it is lost in Fleeces –
It deals Celestial Vail

To Stump, and Stack – and Stem –
A Summer's empty Room –
Acres of Joints, where Harvests were,
Recordless, but for them –

It Ruffles Wrists of Posts
As Ankles of a Queen –
Then still its Artisans – like Ghosts –
Denying they have been –

F-291:

It sifts from Leaden Sieves –
It powders all the Wood –
It fills with Alabaster Wool
The Wrinkles of the Road –

It scatters like the Birds –
Condenses like a Flock –
Like Juggler's Figures situates
Upon a baseless Arc –

It traverses yet halts –
Disperses as it stays –
Then curls itself in Capricorn –
Denying that it was –

More differences coming soon – including poems in Franklin's edition that are NOT in Johnson's "The COMPLETE Poems of Emily Dickinson." Stay tuned!

0 Comments

I Am Whole Once More

Unsolved Mysteries

Letter of Introduction

A World of Difference

Vive La Différence

Archives

PLOG

Categories